Yesterday’s News 2025 06 28

curated citations to news sources


US Supreme Court building

SCOTUSblog: Supreme Court sides with Trump administration on nationwide injunctions in birthright citizenship case


The Trump administration will also likely continue to be barred from enforcing the order – which will not go into effect for 30 days – against the individual pregnant plaintiffs who had challenged it. But the court’s opinion, by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, left open the prospect of additional litigation in the lower courts about how much more the injunctions should be narrowed, as well as the possibility of class action litigation to challenge the order on behalf of groups of plaintiffs who were not part of the litigation before the court but would be affected by the order.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, in an opinion that she read from the bench – a signal of her strong disagreement with the majority’s ruling. She stated that the majority had ruled that, “absent cumbersome class-action litigation, courts cannot completely enjoin even such plainly unlawful policies unless doing so is necessary to afford the formal parties complete relief. That holding renders constitutional guarantees meaningful in name only for any individuals who are not parties to a lawsuit.”

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson filed a separate dissent in which she contended that the majority’s “decision to permit the Executive to violate the Constitution with respect to anyone who has not yet sued is an existential threat to the rule of law.”

(SCOTUSblog more…)

LAWdork: SCOTUS conservatives end “universal injunctions” in birthright citizenship cases

Justice Barrett wrote the 6-3 decision that created more complications than it provided answers. Stark dissents questioned the ruling’s effect on the rule of law.

Steve Vladeck: What Does the Birthright Citizenship Ruling Portend?

Friday’s ruling in Trump v. CASA will fundamentally alter the relationship between federal courts and other government institutions. How much depends upon three questions the decision left unanswered.

Heather Cox Richardson: Letters from an American – June 27, 2025


It is actually a historical myth and a willful misinterpretation of the law that the Civil War ended in 1869, that birthright citizenship came out of a case filed on that exact day, and that the “case” was “very obviously” about “the babies of slaves.” But there were indeed echoes of the past in the administration’s position on immigration today. The administration’s announcement that it is terminating Temporary Protected Status for half a million Haitians, stripping them of their legal status, seems to echo the ancient laws saying only “free white persons” can become citizens.
(Heather Cox Richardson more…)


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *