Yesterday’s News 2025 09 22

curated citations to news sources


Charlie Kirk. Creative Commons image.

Lamar Hankins: The death and life of Charlie Kirk

It should be axiomatic to any freedom-loving person that no one should be harmed for their beliefs, views, or opinions. Yet our country, the supposed citadel of freedom, has experienced assassinations, firings, and other negative actions toward those who express unpopular ideas. Upon learning of Kirk’s death, I thought of the period from 1963 to 1980, a seminal time of my life, and counted seventeen deaths, by guns, of people on the national stage who meant something to me. We are a tragically violent society.

Before Charlie Kirk’s killing, he was barely known to me. In fact, if you had asked me whether Turning Point USA, Kirk’s organization, promoted views right, left, or center, I could not have given you an informed answer. Kirk was not on my radar. Since his death, I have learned why; he was a youth-influencer. He could not have cared less about those of us in our 80s. Maybe that was because some of us who lived through the civil rights struggles of the 1950s to 1970s could have educated him about why Martin Luther King, Jr., was not an “awful” person. King practiced non-violence, unlike the white people who killed four little girls with a bomb at the 16th Street Baptist Church in Birmingham in 1963, and the white killers of James Chaney, Michael Schwerner, and Andrew Goodman a year later. Did Kirk ever read King’s Letter From a Birmingham Jail? Had he done so, his views about race in this country might have been changed. Regardless, those of us with 80 years of living and learning could have explained to him that the term “awful” should be reserved for people who indiscriminately kill children because of their race, who murder peaceful civil rights workers trying to help black people register to vote, and those who kill people for what they believe or say.? Had he done so, his views about race in this country might have been changed. Regardless, those of us with 80 years of living and learning could have explained to him that the term “awful” should be reserved for people who indiscriminately kill children because of their race, who murder peaceful civil rights workers trying to help black people register to vote, and those who kill people for what they believe or say.

(Lamar Hankins more…)

Sarah Jones: The Great Divider: Trump Says He Hates His Opponents at Charlie Kirk Memorial


Donald Trump claimed that Charlie Kirk did not hate his opponents but rather wished the “the best” for them, adding that this was the difference between them because Trump hates his opponents and doesn’t want the best for them.

The truth is, Kirk was a hater and so is Donald Trump. But Kirk seemed to actually believe in the values he espoused, whereas Trump just uses conservative “values” (i.e., racism, misogyny, “small government”, etc) to manipulate his base.
(Sarah Jones more…)

Judd Legum: Sinclair “Special Report” depicts Kirk as prophet

Dean Blundell: How Trump Hijacked Charlie Kirk’s Memorial Turning It Into A Death Cult Rally That Made MILLIONS

National Memo: Charlie Kirk Is Sadly Departed, But The TPUSA Grift Goes On And On


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *