curated news excerpts & citations
Brian Allen: Federal Judges Blow the Whistle on DOJ Deception: 35+ Cases of Lies and “Sham” Evidence
…
The cleanest way to understand this is through the Goodman-led tracking work (published via Just Security) that compiles cases where judges themselves explicitly questioned the government’s truthfulness, accuracy, or good faith.
This matters because it is not punditry. It is not Twitter. It is not “some guy says.”
It is judges putting it in orders and on transcripts.
And the allegations are not all one flavor. They cluster into repeatable misconduct categories:
- False sworn declarations used to win emergency rulings
- Evidence problems judges call “sham,” “misleading,” or “unsupported”
- Noncompliance with court orders followed by legal gymnastics to justify it
- Agency narratives that fall apart under basic cross-checking










